The Mainlynk Network has two primary member roles: the Referring Member and the Funding Member. They are structurally different, with different obligations, different economics, and different readiness requirements. An institution can hold one role, the other, or both — but the roles are not interchangeable, and the requirements for each are distinct.
The Referring Member is the source institution. It holds the customer relationship, identifies the credit need, and submits the opportunity through the Network's controlled workflow. The Referring Member does not make the credit decision. It retains the source attribution, the relationship protections, and the right to be informed of the outcome. The Referring Member's primary obligation is to submit opportunities accurately, completely, and within the scope of the applicable product schedule.
The Funding Member is the receiving institution. It reviews the submitted opportunity, makes the credit decision, and — if it approves — funds, closes, and services the credit. The Funding Member owns the credit risk, the lender-of-record relationship, and the compliance obligations that attach to both. The Funding Member's primary obligation is to make credit decisions responsibly, report outcomes accurately, and comply with the conduct standards that govern its relationship with the source institution's customer.
The readiness requirements for each role are different. A Referring Member must have the workflow infrastructure to identify and submit opportunities correctly, the relationship management practices to maintain the customer relationship through the referral process, and the governance framework to oversee the channel. A Funding Member must have the credit infrastructure, the operational capacity, and the compliance program required to originate and service the product type it is receiving.
Institutions that attempt to hold the Funding Member role without the required credit infrastructure create risk — for themselves, for the Referring Member, and for the customer. The Network's readiness assessment process exists to confirm that a Funding Member has the capability required before it begins receiving opportunities.
The distinction between the two roles is not administrative. It reflects a fundamental difference in what each institution is responsible for — and what it must be able to demonstrate to regulators, examiners, and the other members of the Network.
Factual and performance claims in this article are maintained in Mainlynk's internal claim-support records, including source, period, methodology, assumptions, and whether each claim is historical, projected, illustrative, or supplied by a third party. Member names, logos, testimonials, or data require approval.